|
|
 |
|
Spring 2016
|
A Message from Greg Paielli
Dear Client, Customer, & Friends
Hello and welcome to our Spring Newsletter! In reviewing economic news for the Tucson AZ market the City Mayor Jonathan Rothschild recently delivered a positive speech to local business leaders. In his remarks he focused on the successes of job growth, private investment, trade, tourism, annexation and more. Last year the metro Tucson area added 8,900 jobs. The job market increased by 2.4% in line with the State growths rates. City tax incentives helped spur 170 million in private capital investments which helped create 2,400 new jobs.
Rothschild still said that revenue continues to be a problem for the City to grow further. He said you cannot cut your way to prosperity but rather you need revenue. City council is now considering to ask voters for a half of cent in sales tax to help fund growth. As always, thank you for taking the time to read our newsletter and visiting our site. Your business is invaluable and your referrals are always highly appreciated. Should you need assistance regarding your property management needs, short selling your home, purchasing a new home, or any general questions, please feel free to contact me. We are here to serve you! Thank You,
Greg Paielli
|
|
Turning Down The Applicant
|
Why is it one of the first words we learn to say quickly is “no?” Then, why is it so hard for people to accept when someone says “no?” Whether an owner finds it difficult or not, there are times to say “no” to a prospective tenant.
Most property owners or managers rent to applicants based on credit, income, and rental history. This usually provides a solid foundation on which to approve or deny an applicant. However, many owners are not aware of the many “land mines” there can be when denying an application. Complying with Fair Housing is the primary reason to be on concrete footing when denying an application.
Here is an example of discriminatory practice. Mr. Jones met with two different couples, the Hansons and the Smyths, at his property separately but on the same day. He had the usual rental application with him and distributed it to both parties; both couples were Caucasian and in their mid-thirties. However, Mr. Jones, without even looking at the facts, liked the Smyth couple better. He offered them a reduction in the security deposit that he did not offer to the other party and allowed a small dog when he had informed Mrs. Hanson that he would not accept any animals at any time.
Both parties put in applications and Mr. Jones selected the Smyth application without even contacting their landlords, verifying income, or checking credit on Mr. and Mrs. Smyth. The Hanson couple learned of the reduced security deposit and that Mr. Jones did not check any references on Mr. and Mrs. Smyth. However, he had obtained the Hanson credit report, which did not reflect any negative problems. They promptly took Mr. Jones to court and won a large settlement because he did not treat each applicant equally.
Knowing “what discrimination is and what is not” is often difficult for owners. The Fair Housing laws do cover a vast area, but no property owner is required to rent to applicants with pets, to those who are abusive, and to someone who has poor credit, lack of income, or bad tenant history. However, Fair Housing means that you do not have “separate rules for separate parties.”
Fear often contributes to a landlord making a bad decision. Property owners can be afraid to say no because of a long vacancy and they are losing money. They can be afraid just to face an angry applicant and therefore are willing to accept someone because they intimidate them. Fear of retaliation is another factor in today’s world where people who do not get what they want can become violent.
The right documentation gives power to the reasons for saying no and reduces the fears.
Ms. Stone declared to Mr. Morse that her credit was impeccable and was quite forceful about renting the property immediately. She was willing to pay any rental price. Mr. Morse denied the application. The credit report revealed unpaid bills, collections, and two previous evictions. Ms. Stone had counted on Mr. Morse to “just rent” to her because of her behavior, but when Mr. Morse actually ran the credit report, she had no choice but to accept his decision.
Realizing the benefits of saying “no” can make it easier to deny the applicant when it is necessary. Learning that someone has bad credit means the probability is high that the rental payments will be a problem. Contacting an owner and finding out that they took poor care of the property can save having to spend unnecessary money on future maintenance and rehabilitation. If the applicant is pushy or aggressive, denying their application can mean avoiding future confrontations and unreasonable demands. If an owner has to say no, it helps to look at the entire picture.
Denying an applicant is never easy. However, saying no can reduce future difficulties and financial loss. As your property management company, we know that at times it is necessary to say no, based on sound criteria, to “Protect Your Investment.”
|
|
Serving You
|
Phoenix Office
15650 N. Black Canyon Hwy
Suite B-115
Phoenix, AZ 85053
Tucson Office
1 S Church Ave 12th Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
Las Vegas Office
7455 Arroyo Crossing Pkwy #220
Las Vegas, NV 89113
Mailing Address
P.O. Box 56995
Phoenix, AZ 85079-6995
|
|
|
The material provided in this newsletter is for informational and educational
purposes only. It is NOT legal advice.
Although we believe this material is accurate, we cannot guarantee that
it is 100% without errors.
|
Services Provided By Property Management Newsletters
|
